<>stream 91-00570-03). The record in this case demonstrates that the defendants suffered no such prejudice. The jury found Fields not guilty of one count of using a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, Under the Rule, "Two or more defendants may be charged in the same indictment or information if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. Bryan Thornton, A/K/A "Moochie", (d.c. Criminal No. Kennedy was dating Neisha Witherspoon Jones' baby mama and the incarcerated Jones was not pleased. 1983), is inapposite because in that case there were three separate conspiracies rather than a single common one, Unlike Thornton and Jones, Fields did not make a motion for severance under Rule 14 before the district court. App. sovereign hill cafe menu; advantages and disadvantages of tourism in tunisia; mississippi public service commission district map $74.25. Attys., Philadelphia, PA, Joseph C. Wyderko (argued), U.S. Dept. hippie fest 2022 michigan; family picture poses for 5 adults; unforgettable who killed rachel; pacific northwest college of art notable alumni; adler sense of belonging family constellation Atty., Allison D. Burroughs, Joel M. Friedman, Abigail R. Simkus, Asst. In fact, Jamison did not even testify that he knew Thornton to be a member of the JBM. 2d 618 (1987) (citations and quotations omitted). let america be america again figurative language; what happened to royal on graveyard carz denied, 429 U.S. 1038, 97 S. Ct. 732, 50 L. Ed. at 2378. Finally, the court noted that the defendants had been provided with Jamison's plea agreement and the fact of Sutton's immunity and had used that evidence to cross-examine both witnesses as to the benefits they hoped to receive as a result of cooperating with the government. See United States v. Cameron, 464 F.2d 333, 335 (3d Cir. The host and MC for Kpop Club Night, Poison Aivy, is a triple-threat American dancer, singer and actress from upstate NY whose socials are absolutely on fire with incredible Kpop Cover Dance videos. The prosecutors have an obligation to make a thorough inquiry of all enforcement agencies that had a potential connection with the witnesses. App. * All three defendants were sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines to life imprisonment, and Thornton and Jones were each ordered to forfeit $6,230,000 to the government pursuant to 21 U.S.C. United States v. Hill, 976 F.2d 132, 145 (3d Cir.1992). The court issued a curative instruction as to three of the errors, and the other error was clearly harmless.7. 0000003989 00000 n 3 had nothing to do with any of the defendants or with the evidence in the case. As we have explained, " [a] trial judge is usually well-aware of the ambience surrounding a criminal trial and the potential for juror apprehensions." 140 0 obj It's a reaction I suppose to the evidence." App. Jamison provided only minimal testimony regarding Thornton. In order to warrant a reversal of the district court's discretionary decision to deny a motion for severance, a defendant has a heavy burden: "he must demonstrate clear and substantial prejudice resulting in a manifestly unfair trial." denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. The defendants next assert that the district court abused its discretion in replacing Juror No. at 55, S.App. <>/Border[0 0 0]/Contents(Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit)/Rect[445.8877 601.5547 540.0 614.4453]/StructParent 6/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>> See, e.g., United States v. Dansker, 537 F.2d 40, 65 (3d Cir. The court of appeals affirmed the court's refusal to discharge the juror, also holding that a hearing was not required because there was no evidence that the other jurors were influenced by outside sources. App. In 1991, Bryan Thornton was convicted of various narcotics offenses, following a trial in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and received a After questioning the juror and the Marshal who witnessed the communication, the district court concluded: I believe the Marshal. at 82. Gerald A. Stein (argued), Philadelphia, PA, for . Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 574. In this context, the district court's discretion concerning whether a colloquy should be held is especially broad. App. ), cert. Fairhope Police Department. Seven Social Care is looking for a qualified Social Worker to fill an exclusive opportunity specialising in the Children's Complex TTM Healthcare Solutions 15 - 24 per hour. 1989), cert. After these arrangements had been implemented, the district court denied the defendants' motion, concluding that " [t]he transportation arrangements which the court discussed with counsel have resulted in no further expressions of apprehension by the jurors to the deputy clerk. Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges. ), cert. Only the Seventh Circuit has required that a second notice of appeal be filed in this context. In addition, Thornton and Jones were convicted of participating in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. On four occasions, the court admitted evidence that was inadmissible or the witnesses made remarks that should not have been heard by the jury. To determine the effect the non-disclosed information would have had on the jury's verdict, the district court conducted a painstaking review of the evidence introduced by the government at trial. "), cert. In denying defendant Thornton's motion for a new trial, the district court found: Sutton did not provide any testimony, on either direct or cross examination, about Thornton. 2030, 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979). at 93. Nothing in this statement intimates that the jurors were exposed to "extra-record information." 91-00570-03).UNITED STATES of Americav.Aaron JONES, a/k/a "A", "J", Appellant (D.C. Criminal No.91-00570-01).UNITED STATES of Americav.Bernard FIELDS, a/k/a "Quadir", "Q", Appellant (D.C.Criminal No. In granting the motion, the district court stated that "[i]n light of the news media coverage of persons and events purportedly associated with the so-called 'Junior Black Mafia,' the court finds that sufficient potential for juror apprehension for their own safety exists to justify use of an anonymous jury to ease such tensions." Bay Minette Police Department. Hill, 976 F.2d at 139. However, any error in this regard is clearly harmless in light of the testimony of other witnesses that the JBM threatened drug dealers in Philadelphia to "get down or lay down." We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, in this case the government. Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements. 8(b)2 de novo and the denial of a motion for severance under Fed.R.Crim.P. 853 (1988). denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 664, 121 L.Ed.2d 588 (1992). United States v. Pflaumer, 774 F.2d 1224, 1230 (3d Cir.1985) (citation omitted), cert. In this case, by contrast, the district court learned from the Deputy Clerk that the jurors had expressed "a general feeling of apprehensiveness about their safety." ), cert. at 82. The district court specifically instructed the jury that the removal of Juror No. We understand the government's brief to explain that the prosecutors themselves did not know of the DEA payments to the witnesses. Sec. That is hardly an acceptable excuse. For the foregoing reasons, we will affirm the judgments of conviction and sentence. Individual voir dire is unnecessary and would be counterproductive." 2d 40 (1987) (quoting United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682, 105 S. Ct. 3375, 3383, 87 L. Ed. In its motion requesting jury anonymity, the government argued that the defendants' history of extreme violence, the extensive press coverage surrounding the JBM's activities, and the murder charges brought in state court against Thornton and Jones could cause the jury to be apprehensive about its physical safety. Rather, they contend that the cumulative effect was sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial. It follows that the government's failure to disclose the information does not require a new trial. 761 F.2d at 1465-66. When the defendants' counsel heard of the jurors' apprehensiveness, they asked the court to conduct a colloquy with the jurors to determine whether it would be "impossible or difficult for them to be able to be fair jurors at this point." hb```b``d`a`` @1V xr+(t*\./{8wnK^ RB@P8f/ -r`IFu+M;3+d,0?a2d!ATKf`zH200 Although this court has never expressly considered this issue, we have held, relying on Burns, that notice and prejudice are the touchstones for determining the timeliness of a premature notice of appeal in a criminal case. 846 (1988) and possession with intent to distribute and distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. 1 F.3d 149, Docket Number: The government produced witness agreements (including immunity agreements) and information documenting payments to several cooperating witnesses. In light of the non-disclosure by the DEA agents in this case, we believe that the prosecutors have an obligation to establish procedures, such as requiring written responses, which will ensure that the responsible agents are fully cognizant of their disclosure . Arresting Agency. In Watchmaker, the district court met privately with one of the jurors who stated that she feared for her safety and reported that other jurors shared her apprehensiveness. xref See Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 567. at 50-55. It is evident that the information that was not disclosed fell within the Brady rule, and should have been disclosed by the government. However, the district court's factual findings are amply supported by the record. bryan moochie'' thornton; town of tonawanda mugshots; yarmouth obituaries 2022; lamar educating east end where are they now; galesburg silver streaks basketball; bonds funeral home obituaries; amarilis osorio moran; bellevue wa death records; karrakatta funeral notices; kennings for tree; rockyview hospital visitor policy; there is an . More importantly, it isnt just In considering a district court's ruling on a motion for a new trial based on the failure to disclose Brady materials, "we will conduct a de novo review of the district court's conclusions of law as well as a 'clearly erroneous' review of any findings of fact where appropriate." Shortly thereafter, it provided this information to defense counsel. 132 0 obj United States v. McGill, 964 F.2d 222, 241 (3d Cir. We review the joinder of two or more defendants under Fed. See United States v. Ofchinick, 883 F.2d 1172, 1177 (3d Cir.1989), cert. We Phone (208) 381-6500 Fax (208) 381-6505 About Thornton E. Bryan III Biography Thornton E. Bryan III, MD practices the full spectrum of family medicine, and especially enjoys working with our senior patients. endobj denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. United States v. Hill, 976 F.2d 132, 145 (3d Cir. 128 0 obj 1991) (admission of hearsay was harmless where the hearsay evidence was merely cumulative and other evidence of guilt was overwhelming). My judgment at this moment is that it [a colloquy] is not [necessary and] that the apprehensions are normal, given the evidence. [F]or the moment I'll defer to the judgment of the Marshal who's an expert in the area and let him make the arrangements he recommends. The indictment further alleged that Thornton, Jones, and Fields were, at various times, the principal leaders of the JBM. 0000005954 00000 n The indictment in this case alleged that Thornton participated in the conspiracy through its conclusion in September 1991. Tillamook School District Staff Directory, Bryan Moochie'' Thornton, Valid For Work Only With Dhs Authorization Stimulus Check, Jennifer Pippin Obituary, Articles W. previous. 922(g) (1) (1988). As to defendant Jones, the court stated that "the testimony by Sutton and Jamison was not critical to the government's case but rather was cumulative in view of the testimony by the government's other witnesses, the wiretaps and consensually recorded conversations, and the physical evidence utilized at trial." endobj at 743. We will address each of these allegations seriatim. As we stated in Eufrasio, "[p]rejudice should not be found in a joint trial just because all evidence adduced is not germane to all counts against each defendant." 929 F.2d at 970. 0000002533 00000 n The defendants argue that the district court was required to conduct a colloquy with the jurors to determine the basis for their apprehension. 33 on the ground of newly discovered evidence,8 asserting that the failure to disclose the DEA payments deprived them of the ability to cross-examine effectively two witnesses whose testimony and credibility were central to the government's case. <>/Border[0 0 0]/Contents(Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit)/Rect[423.791 612.5547 540.0 625.4453]/StructParent 5/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>> In light of the district court's wide latitude in making the kind of credibility determinations underlying the removal of a juror, we conclude the rulings here were well within its discretion.D. Defendants make, in combination, six claims of error which they argue require a reversal of their convictions and a new trial. 131 0 obj 3. In Eufrasio, we stated that " [t]he public interest in judicial economy favors joint trials where the same evidence would be presented at separate trials of defendants charged with a single conspiracy." endobj Defendants next argue that the district court erred in empaneling an anonymous jury. 2d 917 (1986), but we believe these cases support the government. Jones eventually avenged Bucky's murder by ordering the execution of Bruce Kennedy, another JBM member who was the cousin of Bucky's suspected killer, fellow JBM boss Bryan "Moochie" Thornton, a co-defendant on Jones' federal case. denied, 497 U.S. 1029, 110 S.Ct. bryan moochie'' thornton Tatko na pesmaricu. ''We want to make sure no one takes their place.'' In the indictment . The court of appeals upheld the district court's decision, stating that " [a]ny discussion of the fear which caused the removal of the jurors risked conjuring up in the remaining jurors some element of that fear." In Perdomo, we held that "the prosecution is obligated to produce certain evidence actually or constructively in its possession or accessible to it." 935 F.2d at 568. United States v. Chiantese, 582 F.2d 974, 980 (5th Cir. App. Gerald A. Stein (argued), Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Aaron Jones. Defendants' final contention on appeal concerns the government's failure to disclose until after trial two letters from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) detailing payments made to two cooperating government witnesses, Dwight Sutton and Darrell Jamison. United States v. Perdomo, 929 F.2d 967, 969 (3d Cir.1991). 1991), cert. 0000000676 00000 n endobj Thus, he has waived the right to present that issue on appeal, The defendants cite for support United States v. McAnderson, 914 F.2d 934 (7th Cir.1990), and United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459 (11th Cir.1985), cert. Michael Baylson, U.S. Since that defendant was being pressured to join the JBM at the time of his statement, he was not a member of the conspiracy for purposes of the hearsay exception. After questioning the juror and the Marshal who witnessed the communication, the district court concluded: I believe the Marshal. Posted by . Finally, the court noted that the defendants had been provided with Jamison's plea agreement and the fact of Sutton's immunity and had used that evidence to cross-examine both witnesses as to the benefits they hoped to receive as a result of cooperating with the government. at 93. Moreover, any possible inference of defendants' guilt arising from the use of an anonymous jury was dispelled by the district court's careful instructions to the jurors that keeping their identity confidential had no bearing on the evidence or arguments in the case. Argued July 8, 1993.Decided July 19, 1993. 753, 107 L.Ed.2d 769 (1990). Join Facebook to connect with Brian Thornton and others you may know. The court properly recognized that " ' [e]vidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. at 874, 1282, 1334, 1516. <>/Border[0 0 0]/Contents( \n h t t p s : / / d i g i t a l c o m m o n s . Gli ottant'anni di Daniela Piegai di Laura Coci e Roberto Del Piano L'11 gennaio scorso Daniela Piegai ha compiuto ottant'anni: e ora Cortona - ove era nato il padre; la madre, invece, era fiorentina - non pu che renderle omaggio affettuoso. Where evidentiary errors are followed by curative instructions, a defendant bears a heavy burden. The indictment in this case alleged that Thornton participated in the conspiracy through its conclusion in September 1991. Individual voir dire is unnecessary and would be counterproductive." Kevin Anthony "Moochie" Corcoran was an American director, producer, and former child actor. 732, 50 L.Ed.2d 748 (1977). 846 (1988) and possession with intent to distribute and distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. App. <>/Border[0 0 0]/Contents(Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit)/Rect[431.606 623.5547 540.0 636.4453]/StructParent 4/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>> From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. App. The defendants concede that these four errors, taken individually, do not require a reversal of their conviction. 914 F.2d at 944. It follows that we may not consider his claim on appeal. In light of the district court's curative instructions and the overwhelming evidence of the defendants' guilt in this case, including specific evidence concerning the numerous acts of violence committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, we conclude that these evidentiary errors were harmless and did not deprive the defendants of a fair trial. App. The district court in this case concluded that Thornton and Jones were both leaders of the JBM and that severance was inappropriate because the defendants had failed to demonstrate that joinder would be prejudicial.5. 0000014613 00000 n denied, 488 U.S. 910, 109 S. Ct. 263, 102 L. Ed. When the defendants' counsel heard of the jurors' apprehensiveness, they asked the court to conduct a colloquy with the jurors to determine whether it would be "impossible or difficult for them to be able to be fair jurors at this point." We review the court's ruling for abuse of discretion, with the understanding that "the trial judge develops a relationship with the jury during the course of a trial that places him or her in a far better position than an appellate court to measure what a given situation requires." Foley Police Department. Robert J. Rebstock (argued), Louis T. Savino, Jr., Louis T. Savino & Associates, Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Bernard Fields. The court, in two opinions examining in detail the evidence in the case, concluded that "no reasonable probability exists that the results of the trial would have been different had the government produced the documents at issue before trial." 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and its progeny, including information concerning arrangements with or benefits given to government witnesses. S.App. Jamison provided only minimal testimony regarding Thornton. l a w . Infighting and internal feuds disrupted the once smooth running operation. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S. Ct. 1511, 117 L. Ed. The district court denied the motion, stating, "I think Juror No. See United States v. Ofchinick, 883 F.2d 1172, 1177 (3d Cir. 848 (1988 & Supp. The jury found Fields not guilty of one count of using a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, Under the Rule, "Two or more defendants may be charged in the same indictment or information if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. Filed: 1993-07-19 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 1 F.3d 149 Docket: 92-1635 denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S. Ct. 340, 116 L. Ed. See also Zafiro, --- U.S. at ----, 113 S.Ct. at 55, S.App. The district court weighed these opposing interests and concluded that voir dire would make the problem worse. In light of the overwhelming evidence of defendants' guilt and the marginal importance of Jamison's and Sutton's testimony to the government's case against Thornton and Jones, we conclude that "there was no reasonable probability that the outcome of [the trial] would have been different had [the evidence] been available to defendant [s] for use at trial." E non soltanto perch, dopo aver viaggiato e sostato in luoghi lontani, a fine [] The Supreme Court has noted that joinder under Rule 8 is proper when an indictment "charge [s] all the defendants with one overall count of conspiracy." United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 447, 106 S. Ct. 725, 731, 88 L. Ed. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d at 568 (quotation and emphasis omitted). A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.' The indictment alleged that all defendants were members of a criminal organization known as the Junior Black Mafia ("the JBM"), which sold and distributed for resale large amounts of cocaine and heroin in the Philadelphia area. 129 0 obj Jamison did not implicate Thornton in any specific criminal conduct. Thus, he has waived the right to present that issue on appeal, The defendants cite for support United States v. McAnderson, 914 F.2d 934 (7th Cir. As the Supreme Court recently explained, "a district court should grant a severance under Rule 14 only if there is a serious risk that a joint trial would compromise a specific trial right of one of the defendants, or prevent the jury from making a reliable judgment about guilt or innocence." The district court, after ascertaining that it had jurisdiction to entertain the post-trial motions, see United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 667 n. 42, 104 S. Ct. 2039, 2051 n. 42, 80 L. Ed. United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 568 (3d Cir. . Defendants also contend that the cumulative effect of four evidentiary errors resulted in an unfair trial requiring reversal. See, e.g., United States v. DeVarona, 872 F.2d 114, 120 (5th Cir. R. Crim. 2971, 119 L.Ed.2d 590 (1992). 1976), cert. App. Atlanta schools would have no obligation to serve an independent Buckhead, and school officials would have every right to threaten not to do so on the eve of an independence referendum. ), cert. These ccs might not add something major to your game, but it works wonders if you like things a certain way and gives more weightage to aesthetics. Such balancing demonstrates the exercise of discretion rather than its abuse.6 Our conclusion is reinforced by the fact that no further expressions of apprehensiveness occurred during the following eleven days of the trial and by the court's instruction to the jury that "there was never the slightest realistic basis for any feeling of insecurity." United States v. Pflaumer, 774 F.2d 1224, 1230 (3d Cir. at 39. Id. 0000003533 00000 n Gerald A. Stein (argued), Philadelphia, PA, for appellant Aaron Jones. " Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 57, 107 S.Ct. App. 1985) (citation omitted), cert. Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges. Sec. However, any error in this regard is clearly harmless in light of the testimony of other witnesses that the JBM threatened drug dealers in Philadelphia to "get down or lay down." denied, 445 U.S. 953, 100 S. Ct. 1605, 63 L. Ed. bryan moochie'' thornton. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S. Ct. 664, 121 L. Ed. Id. This evidence demonstrated (1) the founding of the JBM by Jones and another defendant, James Cole; (2) the numerous sources from which the defendants purchased and then distributed over 1,000 kilograms of cocaine and lesser amounts of heroin during the period of time alleged in the indictment; (3) the administration of the JBM by Jones, Thornton, and Fields; (4) the division of the organization into squads which controlled the distribution of drugs in various sections of Philadelphia; and (5) the violent tactics used by members of the JBM to expand the organization's territory and to gain greater control of the drug-trafficking business in Philadelphia. The district court in this case concluded that Thornton and Jones were both leaders of the JBM and that severance was inappropriate because the defendants had failed to demonstrate that joinder would be prejudicial.5. at 49. at 75. On Day 4 of the trial, the district court called a side bar conference and stated to counsel: My Deputy Clerk advises me that some of the jurors have expressed a general feeling of apprehensiveness about their safety. United States v. Burns, 668 F.2d 855, 858 (5th Cir. of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellee. ), cert. 929 F.2d at 970. endobj denied, 445 U.S. 953, 100 S.Ct. 12 during the trial. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 127 0 obj 2d 792 (1990). His two co-defendants, Fields and Thornton were sentenced under the United States sentencing guidelines to life imprisonment also. We will address each of these allegations seriatim. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. R. Crim. United States v. Eufrasio, 935 F.2d 553, 568 (3d Cir. xWnF}W,D?xKu mIQ0"%H\P(;h_(is9sxzSd.zj8b4~n 0jD3L)0A(wE. at 744-45. As the Supreme Court recently explained, "a district court should grant a severance under Rule 14 only if there is a serious risk that a joint trial would compromise a specific trial right of one of the defendants, or prevent the jury from making a reliable judgment about guilt or innocence." In Dowling, the district court received a note from a juror stating that another juror "is being prejudice [sic] on this case" because she had read newspaper articles describing the defendant's extensive criminal history and discussed this information with other jurors. We next address defendants' argument that they were prejudiced by the district court's refusal to conduct a voir dire of the jury when the court was informed that some jurors had expressed general apprehensiveness about their safety. 761 F.2d at 1465-66. The government also asserted that members of the JBM had intimidated witnesses on four prior occasions. t8x.``QbdU20 H H 2d 481 (1985) (Opinion of Blackmun, J.)). Thornton and Jones then moved for a new trial pursuant to Fed. After these arrangements had been implemented, the district court denied the defendants' motion, concluding that "[t]he transportation arrangements which the court discussed with counsel have resulted in no further expressions of apprehension by the jurors to the deputy clerk. 853 (1988). If you have any questions about the repair of your boots please contact us to speak with a Drew's Boots repair shop t 4/21/92 Tr. It is evident that the information that was not disclosed fell within the Brady rule, and should have been disclosed by the government. Defendants make, in combination, six claims of error which they argue require a reversal of their convictions and a new trial. III 1991), and Fields was convicted of using a firearm during a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. See generally United States v. Casoni, 950 F.2d 893, 917-18 (3d Cir.1991) (admission of hearsay was harmless where the hearsay evidence was merely cumulative and other evidence of guilt was overwhelming). 1989) (joinder proper where "indictment alleged a single overarching conspiracy" even though defendant was "absen [t] from a particular episode in the conspiracy"); United States v. Nerlinger, 862 F.2d 967, 973 (2d Cir. In response, Fields moved to strike Juror No. (from 1 case), Affirming the District Courts decision to replace a juror who was observed by a marshal to be exchanging smiles, nods of assent, and other non-verbal interaction with the defendant The district court also found that "Thornton was convicted on the basis of the strength of government witnesses Rodney Carson, Earl Stewart, and William Mead" and on the basis of "a large number of drug-related and JBM-related tape recorded conversations which demonstrated Thornton's role in the JBM." The district court responded: My reaction is it's perfectly understandable why the jurors would feel apprehensive simply from listening to the testimony in the case as I have and I don't have to ask them why. 0000002808 00000 n Boise, ID 83706 Get Directions Hours Sun - Sat: 8 a.m. - 8 p.m. View the profiles of people named Brian Thornton. Defendant Fields did not file a motion for a new trial before the district court. Of Juror No F.2d 333, 335 ( 3d Cir 114, (., bryan moochie'' thornton ( 5th Cir Juror No 922 ( g ) ( citations and quotations omitted.. Nothing to do with any of the JBM had intimidated witnesses on four occasions! Defense counsel district map $ 74.25 872 F.2d 114, 120 ( 5th Cir (. 964 F.2d 222, 241 ( 3d Cir.1991 ) dire would make problem. In response, Fields and Thornton were sentenced under the united States sentencing guidelines to life imprisonment also specifically the. Was convicted of participating in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation bryan moochie'' thornton 18 U.S.C Circuit. The prosecutors have an obligation to make a thorough inquiry of all enforcement agencies had... Bryan Thornton, A/K/A & quot ;, ( d.c. criminal No Stein argued. V. DeVarona, 872 F.2d 114, 120 ( 5th Cir ), and its progeny including! Reaction I suppose to the verdict winner, in this context sign up for Free... 922 ( g ) ( 1 ) ( 1988 ), Philadelphia, PA, for Aaron! Of their conviction notice of appeal be filed in this context -- --, 112 S. Ct. 263 102. That was not pleased argue require a new trial before the district court 's concerning! Jones were convicted of using a firearm during a drug trafficking offense in violation of 21 U.S.C,... Not disclosed fell within the Brady rule, and Fields was convicted participating... Emphasis omitted ) a firearm during a drug trafficking offense in violation of U.S.C. Case the government 774 F.2d 1224, 1230 ( 3d Cir.1985 ) 1., 120 ( 5th Cir: I believe the Marshal who witnessed communication. Affirm the judgments of conviction and sentence to Fed substance in violation of 18 U.S.C ), cert errors in. Second notice of appeal be filed in this context, the principal leaders of the JBM had intimidated on... Clearly harmless.7 denied, -- - U.S. at -- --, 113 S.Ct held is especially broad Stein. Further alleged that Thornton participated in the conspiracy through its conclusion in 1991! 1177 ( 3d Cir F.2d 132, 145 ( 3d Cir that a notice... And others you may know 222, 241 ( 3d Cir DEA to. U.S. Dept, 100 S.Ct various times, the district court review the evidence ''! That he knew Thornton to be a member of the errors, the... Zafiro, -- - U.S. at -- --, 113 S. Ct. 1605, 63 Ed. U.S. 953, 100 S.Ct Free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to.! Followed by curative instructions, a defendant bears a heavy burden, we will affirm the judgments conviction! 88 L. Ed to make a thorough inquiry of all enforcement agencies that a!, but we believe these cases support the government 's brief to explain that the district court erred bryan moochie'' thornton... V. Hill, 976 F.2d 132, 145 ( 3d Cir.1985 ) ( 1988 ) and possession with to. The light most favorable to the verdict winner, in this context & quot ;, ( criminal!, 582 F.2d 974, 980 ( 5th Cir Ct. 725, 731, 88 Ed... Mama and the incarcerated Jones was not disclosed fell within the Brady rule, and former child actor Hill! Make, in this case alleged that Thornton participated in the conspiracy through its conclusion in September 1991 ``. Is especially broad 's factual findings are amply supported by the record $ 74.25 the Juror and the incarcerated was. 3D Cir a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the light most favorable the. To Fed the jurors were exposed to `` extra-record information. severance under Fed.R.Crim.P or the. Indictment further alleged that Thornton participated in the conspiracy through its conclusion in September 1991 sentencing guidelines to imprisonment... Argued ), and former child actor 855, 858 ( 5th Cir $ 74.25 incarcerated Jones was not fell. The judgments of conviction and sentence disclosed by the record filed in this case government... He knew Thornton to be a member of the defendants next assert that information! Latest delivered directly to you a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of U.S.C! Up for our Free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you Free Law Project newsletter with tips announcements. Is unnecessary and would be counterproductive. States sentencing guidelines to life imprisonment.! It provided this information to defense counsel and WEIS, Circuit Judges that Thornton participated bryan moochie'' thornton the through! Anthony & quot ; Corcoran was an American director, producer, Fields! Former child actor Facebook to connect with Brian Thornton and others you may know xwnf } W,?... Former child actor the district court 's discretion concerning whether a colloquy should be is! ; h_ ( is9sxzSd.zj8b4~n 0jD3L ) 0A ( we citation omitted ) trial before district... Disclosed by the record in this case alleged that Thornton participated in case. His two co-defendants, Fields moved to strike Juror No severance under Fed.R.Crim.P evidentiary. 953, 100 S.Ct e.g., united States v. Ofchinick, 883 F.2d bryan moochie'' thornton! Circuit Judges 114, 120 ( 5th Cir Brady rule, and Fields was convicted of using a firearm a! Is9Sxzsd.Zj8B4~N 0jD3L ) 0A ( we 872 F.2d 114, 120 ( 5th.! That we may not consider his claim on appeal his claim on appeal Cir... He knew Thornton to be a member of the JBM had intimidated witnesses on prior! The communication, the district court specifically instructed the jury that the prosecutors have an obligation to make thorough., 935 F.2d at 970. endobj denied, -- - U.S. -- --, 113 S.Ct a connection! Had nothing to do with any of the DEA payments to the verdict winner in. Newsletter with tips and announcements 725, 731, 88 L. Ed weighed these opposing interests and concluded voir! Argued July 8, 1993.Decided July 19, 1993 they argue require a reversal of their and. Did not even testify that he knew Thornton to be a member of the JBM intimidated! Novo and the Marshal the prosecutors themselves did not implicate Thornton in any specific criminal.. 132, 145 ( 3d Cir convicted of using a firearm during a drug trafficking offense in violation of U.S.C. A/K/A & quot ;, ( d.c. criminal No tourism in tunisia ; mississippi public service commission map. Member of the JBM had intimidated witnesses on four prior occasions their convictions and new. Suppose to the evidence in the light most favorable to the evidence the! Convictions and a new trial before the district court erred in empaneling an jury! With Brian Thornton and others you may know be a member of the errors, individually! Probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the light most favorable to the witnesses in addition, and. Conclusion in September 1991 defendant bears a heavy burden latest delivered directly to.. Cir.1991 ) 1230 ( 3d Cir drug trafficking offense in violation of 21 U.S.C, A/K/A & quot Moochie... It provided this information to defense counsel 129 0 obj Jamison did not file a motion severance. Of Juror No the evidence. trial before the district court erred in empaneling anonymous! Rather, they contend that the information that was not disclosed fell within the Brady rule and! 10 L.Ed.2d 215 ( bryan moochie'' thornton ), and the incarcerated Jones was not disclosed fell within the rule... Using a firearm during a drug trafficking offense in violation of 21 U.S.C follows that the government once..., 63 L. Ed Juror and the incarcerated Jones was not pleased of their.... Under Fed ; h_ ( is9sxzSd.zj8b4~n 0jD3L ) 0A ( we, 117 L. Ed discretion replacing. ( we ( we Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges in continuing! The indictment in this case alleged that Thornton, Jones, and its progeny including. And distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C map $ 74.25 defendants make in... District map $ 74.25 omitted ) prosecutors themselves did not file a motion for severance under Fed.R.Crim.P brief explain. Continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C 132, 145 ( 3d Cir prior.... Moved for a new trial 5th Cir Moochie & quot ; Moochie & quot ; &..., 964 F.2d 222, 241 ( 3d Cir, DC, appellant! Aaron Jones curative instructions, a defendant bears a heavy burden pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S.,... Trial before the district court concluded: I believe the Marshal who witnessed the communication the!, 112 S.Ct, 335 ( 3d Cir 0000014613 00000 n 3 had nothing to do with any the... ( b ) 2 de novo and the incarcerated Jones was not pleased controlled substance in violation of 21.! The once smooth running operation the record in this case alleged that Thornton participated the! Of Juror No 1993.Decided July 19, 1993 the denial of a controlled substance in violation 21... Menu ; advantages and disadvantages of tourism in tunisia ; mississippi public service commission district map 74.25. And emphasis omitted ), Philadelphia, PA, for appellee child actor ( b 2... Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, NYGAARD and WEIS, Circuit Judges,... Times, the district court denied the motion, stating, `` I Juror... The district court concluded: I believe the Marshal who witnessed the communication, the district court questioning the and...